Carnage And Culture

by

  1. Carnage And Culture Summary Hanson
  2. Carnage And Culture Pdf
  1. This book is more than a contribution to the 'decisive battles of Western history' genre, for the author has chosen the word 'landmark' with care. He describes vividly more than two millennia of battles to underscore an overarching theme: the West's enduring military superiority. Not surprisingly for a prolific historian of ancient Greece, Hanson believes that the roots of Western military.
  2. Offering riveting battle narratives and a balanced perspective that avoids simple triumphalism, Carnage and Culture demonstrates how armies cannot be separated from the cultures that produce them and explains why an army produced by a free culture will always have the advantage.
  3. 'Carnage and Culture' is, in my eyes, an example of essentialist history done badly. So, first I'll just briefly address what I mean by 'essentialist': That is when the historian claims to have discovered some essence that define and explain whatever is being discussed. Apr 02, 2003 Carnage and Culture is an enthralling, hard-hitting analysis.

I have been a fan of Dr. Hanson’s work since I first read The Western Way of War: Infantry Battle in Classical Greece years ago while pursuing my undergrad degree in Military History. Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power is almost 20 years old at this point and I wish I had read it back then. Since I did not, let me review it now.

In Carnage and Culture, he offers fundamental and systematic reasons why history has unfolded as it has, particularly military history. His thesis is that the undeniable Western advantage in warfare itself, particularly on the battlefield, stems directly from the cultural traits of Western societies.

First the facts: the book is 464 pages of text divided into ten topical chapters with a preface, epilogue, and afterword. There is a glossary, further reading section, and index as well.

Carnage And Culture Summary Hanson

The book is an examination of nine land and naval battles that span the history of the Western world from the ancient Greeks at Salamis in 480 BC to the Tet Offensive in 1968. This is not just a simple narrative account of each battle however. Indeed, all the battles presented are not Western victories as the 216 BC battle of Cannae is one of those described. What the battles are used for is to describe the differences but especially the continuities in the Western Way of War of the past 2 ½ millennia.

Each chapter starts off with a description of the circumstances, context, and a narrative of the battle concerned. That is just the jumping off point however as Dr. Hanson then goes on to examine in detail the what led to the battle and its immediate aftermath. He examines and describes the cultural characteristics of victor and defeated and uses that discussion to show why and how the battle is relevant to his larger discussion of attempting to understand why the West has been singularly successful in waging war over the course of recorded history.

That discussion of western military success is what the book is really about. He attempts, and largely succeeds in my opinion, to show that there are certain cultural qualities to western militaries that have led to consistent western military success. The main qualities he identifies are 1. A free citizenry 2. Civic militarism 3. Discipline in the ranks and 4. Collective vice individual heroism 5. A preference for decisive battles and 6. A desire for enemy annihilation/destruction over negotiated settlements.

I have to say that I agree with him on these points and he brings some pretty strong arguments to bear to prove his point. He is at pains to point out that there is nothing racial about his argument, it is completely cultural and he is right. There are people, lay and academic, that seek a racial argument for just about everything but that argument falls apart when you simply look at facts and facts are what Dr. Hanson is presenting.

Carnage And Culture

The fact is the West has historically been more successful militarily and as is so eloquently pointed out in this book the most deadly wars the west has fgought has been when westerners fight each other. When westerners fight other cultures the body count is almost invariably lopsided in the West’s favor. It is possible to acknowledge that this is so and try to analyze why and that is what this book attempts to do.

Dr. Hanson as always, writes in an engaging style that almost demands the reader think about what is being while you are reading it. He presents some very thoughtful evidence and analysis. What is missing, and that may reflect when the book was written, is that the modern West seems to be moving away from its winning formula and an analysis of why that may be so. I highly recommend this thought provoking and well-written book.

  • ABOUT
  • METHOD
  • SEMINARS
  • MEMBERSHIP
  • FEATURES
  • RESOURCES

Carnage And Culture Pdf

Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power.
Victor Davis Hanson (Doubleday, September 2001, 492 pp., $29.95)
Reviewed by J. Clements

“Military history must never stray from the tragic story killing”

– Victor D. Hanson

“The general public itself is mostly unaware of their culture’s own singular and continuous lethality in arms…for the past 2,500 years…there has been a peculiar practice of Western warfare, a common foundation and continual way of fighting that has made Europeans the most deadly soldiers in the history of civilization.”So begins an early portion of this unique and forceful book that goes far beyond the suggestion of its humble title.The work will be of particular interest to students of historical fencing studies as it provides a unique perspective on the military tradition underlying our entire Western martial heritage.

Victor Hanson offers a lively, highly readable and controversial view of Western military tradition as being a direct offshoot of the values inherent in Western civilization.The central lesson of the book is how “The West’s rise to dominance was not an accident. Its military prowess over the centuries has been the result of 'larger social, economic, political, and cultural practices that themselves seemingly have little to do with war.”Professor Hanson argues convincingly that we possess “a long standing Western cultural stance toward rationalism, free inquiry, and the dissemination of knowledge that has its roots in classical antiquity.”He states his case unapologetically, relating that “while most historians admit of a European dominance in arms from the sixteenth to twentieth centuries, fewer profess that since its creation the West has enjoyed martial advantages over its adversaries –or that such dominance is based not merely on superior weaponry but on cultural dynamism itself.”

The book presents its material by selecting nine important battles that Hanson chooses to present larger ideas about the nature of Western civilization and it’s cultural values in contrast to Asia, Africa, and South America, in order to explain “Why the West Has Won.”He uses these to address larger questions as to why Europeans colonized Asian and Africa, and the Americas and not vice versa, and why Western values –especially in the realm of military science – have proven their worth and now dominate the world.

“The dramatic European expansion of the sixteenth century may well have been energized by western excellence in firearms and capital ships, but those discoveries were themselves the product of a long-standing Western approach to applied capitalism, science, and rationalism not found in other cultures.Thus, the sixteenth-century military renaissance was a reawakening of Western dynamism.It is better to call it a “transformation” in the manifestation of European battlefield superiority that had existed in the classical world for a millennium and was never entirely lost even during the darkest days of the Dark Ages.The “Military Revolution,” then, was no accident, but logical given the Hellenic origins of European civilization.”

Central to his thesis is the idea of individualism and civic militarism –ideas of which were spawned exclusively in ancient Greece (and their ancillaries consensual government, civilian audit, free speech, dissent, and market economics).As a classical scholar, Hanson misses no opportunity (sometimes repetitively so) to somehow relate every facet of history back to the ancient Greeks.From here he stresses the importance of a traditional “Western way of war” founded upon the concepts of shock infantry and battle of annihilation (this was in fact the very title of his earlier work on ancient Greek warfare).

Hanson’s presents a view not often encountered of the “resilience and lethality of the West” that makes perfect sense.The basis of the book is that “In battles against the peoples of Asia, Africa, and the new World, tribal and imperial alike, there is a shared legacy over centuries that allowed Europeans and Americans to win in a consistent and deadly manner –or to be defeated on rare occasions only when the enemy embraced their own military organization, borrowed their weapons, or trapped them far from home.”To this he concludes “From the fighting of early Greece to the wars of the entire twentieth century, there is a certain continuity of European military practice….this heritage of the Western war is not found in its entirety elsewhere, nor does it begin earlier than the Greeks.” And that “the military affinities in Western war making across time and space from the Greeks to the present are uncanny, enduring, and too often ignored.”

Hanson’s real talent as a historian is his way of presenting cold facts in a brutal no-nonsense manner that still manages to instill excitement and appreciation to the reader for the humanity involved without losing the larger picture.The book offers ten chapters beginning with the crucial naval battle of Salamis in 480 BC where a vastly out numbered Greek fleet decimated a Persian armada to essentially save Western civilization.Next he contrast the armies, methods, and motives between East and West as exemplified in Alexander’s victory over the Persians at Gaugamela in 331 BC.He then dissects the Roman defeat by Hannibal at Cannae in 216 BC and manages to show how even this was no set back.He then scrutinizes the first battle of Poitiers in 732 AD where Western Europe was saved from the Moors by a Frankish army.The most interesting chapter is that on battle of Tenochtitlán during Cortez’s conquest of the Aztecs in 1520.It will also be of the most interest to students of Renaissance martial arts.Here Hanson presents a wide range of sober facts deflate the popular view of noble Mexica’s simply being slaughtered by the “guns, germs and steel” of evil Conquistadors and reveals the encounter as being at its core a “conflict of cultures”.Considerable material is presented that place success on the frequently minimized importance of Spanish military skills and martial prowess.The next chapter considers the Mediterranean naval battle of Lepanto in 1571 between the Turks and an Euro-Italian alliance.The details of the account provide some of the most significant examples supporting Hanson’s thesis.Skipping ahead the work then analyzes the 1879 battle of Rorke’s Drift during the Zulu war offering a number of observations.The battle of Midway in 1942 is then presented as a further example of the fundamental difference between the Western way of war and that of the rest of the planet, and how the element of cultural values plays such an important role in how and why different people’s fight.Lastly, he ends with an anatomy of the tactical victory but strategic failure of the 1968 Tet offensive in the Vietnam war and how to a very large degree it characterizes the entire conflict.He is also careful to point out (at least toward the end) that “The battles of this study are offered as representative examples of general traits rather than absolute laws of military.They are episodes that reflect recurring themes, not chapters in a comprehensive history of Western warfare.”

Though historians and military experts could surely debate ad nauseum the exceptions and minor details of his examples (such as the case of the Mongols and Ottomans), as any good writer does, Hanson generalizes in order to present the underlying fundamental elements with clarity.Indeed, at one point he specifically acknowledges, “Although important exceptions should always be noted, generalization –so long avoided by academics out of either fear or ignorance –is indispensable in the writing of history.”

In many ways the work is a refutation of Jared Diamond’s Pulitzer Prize winning, Guns, Germs, and Steel, of which Hanson points out some of the racism underlying Diamond’s view.In essence, Hanson’s view is that there is no clearer example of the differences in ideas and values that form the basis of cultures than in the clash of between East and West, specifically on the battlefield.Diamond, a geographical determinist beloved by cultural-relativists, has argued that differences of societies, technology, and successful civilizations can all be reduced to the luck of where they first rooted (i.e., what crops and livestock the land supported, the topology of their terrain, and what minerals were under their feet).Following Diamond’s theory, we could imagine that the results of playing a good campaign of Sid Mier’s computer game Civilization would not be determined by the ideas and wits of each individual player’s own stratagems and decisions, but merely the random starting location each was given on the map.Anyone who’s played the game at length knows full well that just as in real life, given the available resources individual choices affect the direction each culture takes.As Hanson puts it early on: “Land, climate, weather, natural resources, fate, luck, a few rare individuals of brilliance, natural disaster, and more –all these play their role in the formation of a distinct culture, but it is impossible to determine exactly whether man, nature, or chance is the initial catalyst for the origins of western civilization.What is clear, however, is that once developed, the West, ancient and modern, placed far fewer religious, cultural, and political impediments to natural inquiry, capital formation, and individual expression than did other societies, which often were theocracies, centralized palatial dynasties, or tribal unions.”

He rightly points out that historically, “Western armies in Africa, Asia, and the Americas, as soldiers everywhere, were often annihilated –often lead by fools and placed in the wrong place in the wrong war at the wrong time.But their armies, for the cultural reasons this book has outlined, fought with a much greater margin of error than did their adversaries.”He further contends Western armies “enjoyed innate advantages that over the long duration could offset the terrible effects of imbecilic generalship, flawed tactics, strained supply lines, difficult terrain, and inferior numbers –or a simple “bad day”.These advantages were immediate and entirely cultural, and they were not the product of the genes, germs, or geography of a distant past.”

Professor Hanson’s thesis rings truer in light of recent events post 9/11, where we witnessed Afghanistan, the so-called “graveyard of Empires” collapse in a matter of weeks in the face of overwhelming technological might and brute firepower of the world’s ultimate Western military force.Further, the current “clash of civilizations” only plays out the next chapter of Hanson’s clear-sighted and remarkable book celebrating “the age old and arrogant Western idea that nothing is inexplicable to the god Reason.”

Because serious military history is often a weak spot among practitioners of Medieval and Renaissance fencing and has been so overlooked in university circles, indeed, even dismissed as not “politically correct”, Professor Hanson’s highly original work is a timely and very welcome beacon of light.This book is highly recommended for anyone interested in Historical European martial arts.It particularly agreed with me as it presented ideas I had either long suspected or previously concluded on my own.It even reflects the germ of an idea I actually closed my ’98 Medieval Swordsmanship book with, that our Western martial heritage is very much alive and well and all around us, but in different forms than chivalric armored knights and cavalier musketeers.Even if you end up questioning his conclusions, you will not easily dismiss the strength of his ideas.

Carnage And Culture
Note: The word 'ARMA' and its associated arms emblem is a federally registered trademark under U.S. Reg. No. 3831037. In addition, the content on this website is federally registered with the United States Copyright Office, © 2001-2020. All rights are reserved. No use of the ARMA name and emblem, or website content, is permitted without authorization. Reproduction of material from this site without written permission of The Association for Renaissance Martial Arts and its respective authors is strictly prohibited. Additional material may also appear from 'HACA' The Historical Armed Combat Association copyright © 1999-2001 by John Clements. All rights are reserved to that material as well.